The ideology of the petit bourgeoisie, which drenches this society, does not know loyalty; on the contrary, opportunism, the easy profit, that behaviour of dithering flock, is its Cain mark. That is why it is impossible that it would drive the Revolutionary process to a good end.
With the first row it changes teams, it is changeable and vulnerable, and it is incapable to take long-term actions, any step on the way frightens it, and any doubt makes it give up.
With that backdrop we have to analyze the Joaquin Becerra’s episode. Without a doubt it was a mistake, and we will not go into a great detail about it, a lot of people already has written and stated about it, that event is well known. We will just study the causes of his flaws, its meaning and evolution.
First of all we have to reassert our faith in Commander Chavez, above and beyond the natural errors; he is the leader of this Revolution. The risk of errors is inherent to Revolutionary action; if someone knows a leader that has not made mistakes and he/she has never mistaken, should cast the first stone. Not even the Pope is infallible, from Marx to Bolivar, Che, Fidel, and Fabricio, all of them made mistakes through their history.
What is important is keeping the continuity in the fighting, and defeating the consequenceless swinging; there is the importance of discipline, confidence and loyalty towards the leader, and they let, beyond the flaws, to keep the coherence of strengths. Only discipline beats the petit bourgeoisie hesitation and gives strategic deepness to the fight.
Now, we should study the background of the `capture and return´ of Joaquin Becerra. The fact can only be understood if we see it from the fierce battle inside Revolution. Two visions of the world face up here: the restored reformism and the Revolutionary vision.
Reformism has become bolder, it moves forward on the ideological weaknesses of Revolution that hamper the clarity of the course. They develop their economic conciliation project, also the social and political project; they bring bourgeoisie to power and simultaneously attack hatefully any brushstroke of Revolution. They prefer to sit with a banker than with a Revolutionary.
Revolution will only succeed and it will only be possible with the defeat of the restorer reformism.
There is only one solution to the internal confrontation: to deepen into Revolutionary actions and to fight harshly against the theoretical loss. The nodding towards the Right has an origin, mainly, in the weakness of the Revolutionary praxis.
The principal cause for the loss, which we regret today and the main pillar that we have to correct is the theoretical weakness. While we are on the subject, it is necessary understand this field that has been sabotage internally. Chavez has called plenty of attempts, from the “moral and enlightenment motive” until the “ideological congress”; all had been sabotage with a damper.
It is important to recall the utmost of the classical authors: “Without a Revolutionary theory there will not be Revolutionary practice”.
With Chavez, all!!
Without him, nothing!!
With the first row it changes teams, it is changeable and vulnerable, and it is incapable to take long-term actions, any step on the way frightens it, and any doubt makes it give up.
With that backdrop we have to analyze the Joaquin Becerra’s episode. Without a doubt it was a mistake, and we will not go into a great detail about it, a lot of people already has written and stated about it, that event is well known. We will just study the causes of his flaws, its meaning and evolution.
First of all we have to reassert our faith in Commander Chavez, above and beyond the natural errors; he is the leader of this Revolution. The risk of errors is inherent to Revolutionary action; if someone knows a leader that has not made mistakes and he/she has never mistaken, should cast the first stone. Not even the Pope is infallible, from Marx to Bolivar, Che, Fidel, and Fabricio, all of them made mistakes through their history.
What is important is keeping the continuity in the fighting, and defeating the consequenceless swinging; there is the importance of discipline, confidence and loyalty towards the leader, and they let, beyond the flaws, to keep the coherence of strengths. Only discipline beats the petit bourgeoisie hesitation and gives strategic deepness to the fight.
Now, we should study the background of the `capture and return´ of Joaquin Becerra. The fact can only be understood if we see it from the fierce battle inside Revolution. Two visions of the world face up here: the restored reformism and the Revolutionary vision.
Reformism has become bolder, it moves forward on the ideological weaknesses of Revolution that hamper the clarity of the course. They develop their economic conciliation project, also the social and political project; they bring bourgeoisie to power and simultaneously attack hatefully any brushstroke of Revolution. They prefer to sit with a banker than with a Revolutionary.
Revolution will only succeed and it will only be possible with the defeat of the restorer reformism.
There is only one solution to the internal confrontation: to deepen into Revolutionary actions and to fight harshly against the theoretical loss. The nodding towards the Right has an origin, mainly, in the weakness of the Revolutionary praxis.
The principal cause for the loss, which we regret today and the main pillar that we have to correct is the theoretical weakness. While we are on the subject, it is necessary understand this field that has been sabotage internally. Chavez has called plenty of attempts, from the “moral and enlightenment motive” until the “ideological congress”; all had been sabotage with a damper.
It is important to recall the utmost of the classical authors: “Without a Revolutionary theory there will not be Revolutionary practice”.
With Chavez, all!!
Without him, nothing!!
No comments:
Post a Comment