Let’s recall that the forms of property, consciousness, ideas, are not independent, they form a group where they influence each other. We know that, in disagreement with the postulates of the classical writers, revolutions have happened in countries of low development of productive forces, and low proletariat. This brings out a question: how was possible to make revolution with countries with low development?, what is the teaching and how to apply it? Let's see.
While realizing the revolutionary possibility in a country with little development of productive forces, with little proletariat, immediately becomes evident a contradiction between the ideologies that arise from this situation and ideological developments of the world Revolution.
If Revolution is captured by the proper ideologies of that precarious level of development of productive forces, then it be will dilute in the conservative political forms, late, at most bourgeois, and it will not make the historical leap. Such was the case after the fall of perez jimenez: during that time, the villager ideology that guided us, could not break the logic of domination.
Now, if Revolution is driven by the ideology of vanguard, for the most advanced at that time, then Revolution will break the logic of domination. Such was the case of the Independence Revolution of America: the liberators assimilated the French Revolution theory, the Bourgeois Revolution; although here, there was not a developed bourgeoisie. They were able to defeat the ideologies that revolved around monarchical domination, as the one proposed by the Protection of Rights Board of Fernando VII.
The Cuban Revolution is an extraordinary example: there, they knew how to make a revolution from the field, but led by the most advanced ideology of that time. So, they got to rise above their circumstances.
The lesson is clear to us: it is necessary to rise above the ideologies that emanate from our lack of material development, overcoming the ideologies that feed of our condition of rentier, and rely ourselves on the most advanced universal revolutionary thought, on the thought of the Cuban Revolution, Che, Fidel.
It is indispensable the Social property of means of production, administered by the State, that is the only way to be social. It is urgent to elevate the Consciousness of Social Duty, bringing the economic forms and the Consciousness of Social Duty to excess. So, with the excess the worlds are founded.
If we fall prey to the proper ideologies of our condition of rentier country, if we surrender to the logic installed -by centuries- of political patronage, and if we seek the revolutionary answer within the outputs of "collective selfishness", non social, we will be in the best of cases, distributing the incomes more equitably, but not founding a new society. And so, to the little adverse blowing wind, all will makes us collapse. The selfish collective forms (non social) will be necessarily against the Revolutionary Government, and in the end we will realize that we are walking in circles, and we let drain the opportunity to realize the miracle.
With Chavez all!
While realizing the revolutionary possibility in a country with little development of productive forces, with little proletariat, immediately becomes evident a contradiction between the ideologies that arise from this situation and ideological developments of the world Revolution.
If Revolution is captured by the proper ideologies of that precarious level of development of productive forces, then it be will dilute in the conservative political forms, late, at most bourgeois, and it will not make the historical leap. Such was the case after the fall of perez jimenez: during that time, the villager ideology that guided us, could not break the logic of domination.
Now, if Revolution is driven by the ideology of vanguard, for the most advanced at that time, then Revolution will break the logic of domination. Such was the case of the Independence Revolution of America: the liberators assimilated the French Revolution theory, the Bourgeois Revolution; although here, there was not a developed bourgeoisie. They were able to defeat the ideologies that revolved around monarchical domination, as the one proposed by the Protection of Rights Board of Fernando VII.
The Cuban Revolution is an extraordinary example: there, they knew how to make a revolution from the field, but led by the most advanced ideology of that time. So, they got to rise above their circumstances.
The lesson is clear to us: it is necessary to rise above the ideologies that emanate from our lack of material development, overcoming the ideologies that feed of our condition of rentier, and rely ourselves on the most advanced universal revolutionary thought, on the thought of the Cuban Revolution, Che, Fidel.
It is indispensable the Social property of means of production, administered by the State, that is the only way to be social. It is urgent to elevate the Consciousness of Social Duty, bringing the economic forms and the Consciousness of Social Duty to excess. So, with the excess the worlds are founded.
If we fall prey to the proper ideologies of our condition of rentier country, if we surrender to the logic installed -by centuries- of political patronage, and if we seek the revolutionary answer within the outputs of "collective selfishness", non social, we will be in the best of cases, distributing the incomes more equitably, but not founding a new society. And so, to the little adverse blowing wind, all will makes us collapse. The selfish collective forms (non social) will be necessarily against the Revolutionary Government, and in the end we will realize that we are walking in circles, and we let drain the opportunity to realize the miracle.
With Chavez all!
No comments:
Post a Comment